EACH CASE DEPENDS ON A VARIETY OF UNIQUE FACTS AND PAST RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN THE FUTURE.
Representative matters on which Mr. Morgan has worked include:
ITC Injury Cases
• Silicon Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Norway, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-567-569 and 731-TA-1343-1345. Successfully defended company against allegation that critical circumstances existed.
• Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from China. Successfully defended company against allegation that critical circumstances existed.
• Large Diameter Pipe from Canada, China, Greece, India, Korea, and Turkey. Defended company in preliminary phase of the investigation.
• Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing from China, Germany, India, Italy, Korea, and Switzerland. Defended company in the preliminary phase of the ITC investigation.
• Domestic Dry Containers from China. Led team in preliminary phase of injury investigation.
• Steel Wheels from China. Part of team in successful defense of Chinese steel wheel manufacturers in AD/CVD investigation.
• Coated Free Sheet Paper from China, Indonesia, and Korea. Led team in successful defense of Chinese and Indonesian-coated paper manufacturers in AD/CVD investigation.
• Bearings from China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and the United Kingdom. Led team in successful defense of Singapore ball bearings producer in ITC sunset review.
• Calendar Slides from Japan. Led team in successful defense of Japanese manufacturer in antidumping investigation of metal calendar slides
ITC Section 337 Cases
• Certain Stainless Steel Products, Certain Processes for Manufacturing or Relating to Same and Certain Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-933. Co-counsel representing complainants Valbruna Slater Stainless Steel, Inc., Valbruna Stainless Inc., and Acciaierie Valbruna. Case successfully resulted in the imposition of an order excluding targeted products from being imported into the United States.
• Portable Electronic Communication Devices, Including Mobile Phones and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-885. Part of team representing Google; case settled.
• Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones and Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-847. Part of team representing Google; case settled.
• Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Including Monitors, Televisions, and Modules, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-741/749. Part of team in successful defense of ChimeiInnolux Corporation (now Innolux).
• Large Scale Integrated Circuit Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-716.Part of team that obtained settlement for Panasonic.
• Coamoxiclav Products, Potassium Clavulanate Products, and Other Products Derived from Clavulanic Acid, Inv. No. 337-TA-479. Part of team that obtained favorable settlement for Geneva Pharmaceutical Inc.
Other Notable Cases
• DS529 Australia – Anti-Dumping Measures on A4 Copy Paper from Indonesia. Represented the Government of Indonesia before a WTO Panel which ruled Australia’s measures were inconsistent with its obligations.
• Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada. Part of team in successful defense of Canadian companies’ interests in judicial and administrative proceedings throughout the most recent softwood lumber dispute between Canada and the United States; and.
• Co-Steel Raritan, Inc. v. International Trade Com’n, 357 F.3d 1294 (Fed. Cir. 2004). Led team in successful representation of Venezuelan wire rod producer at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, resulting in a reversal of the trial court’s decision.
Tips for the New Practitioner at the US Court of International Trade, Georgetown
University Law Center Continuing Legal Education Seminar Materials, Trade and
Customs Law Refresher, January 2007